Post by : Saif Nasser
The Supreme Court of the United States has agreed to hear a major case that could change how the country understands birthright citizenship. This issue is tied to the 14th Amendment of the Constitution, which has guaranteed citizenship for children born on American soil since the late 1800s. The court will now decide if President Donald Trump’s order to restrict this right is lawful.
The case began after President Trump issued an order on his first day back in office on January 20. The order told federal agencies not to give citizenship to babies born in the United States if their parents are not American citizens or green card holders. This directive was part of a larger plan by the administration to reduce both legal and illegal immigration.
Lower courts quickly blocked the order, saying it violated the Constitution and a federal law that protects birthright citizenship. Parents and children who feared losing their citizenship filed lawsuits, and judges ruled in their favor. The government appealed the decision, and now the Supreme Court will make the final call. The justices will hear arguments this term and are expected to announce their decision by the end of June.
The 14th Amendment was created after the Civil War to ensure equality and to give citizenship to formerly enslaved people. It states that anyone born in the United States, and under its jurisdiction, is a citizen. For more than a century, this has been understood to include children of immigrants, even if the parents are not citizens.
The Trump administration argues that this interpretation is too broad. It says the phrase subject to the jurisdiction means that only children of those with lawful, permanent ties to the United States should receive citizenship. Government lawyers claim that short term visitors, students, workers on temporary visas, or people in the country illegally do not meet this requirement.
Supporters of the order say that birthright citizenship encourages illegal immigration and leads to what they call birth tourism, where pregnant women enter the United States to give birth so their children will become citizens. They say change is needed to protect national security and reduce misuse of immigration laws.
But the challengers say the Constitution is clear, and that the Supreme Court already ruled on this issue in 1898 in a case known as Wong Kim Ark. In that case, the court confirmed that a child born in the United States to non citizen parents is still an American citizen. They also point to a federal law passed in 1952 that repeats the same principle. Civil rights groups argue that no president has the power to change a constitutional rule through an executive order.
The case has created deep debate across the country. Immigration has been one of the most divisive topics of both Trump terms. Critics say his policies unfairly target certain groups and violate long standing values. Supporters believe the system needs stronger rules and that the United States must control who becomes a citizen.
This is not the first time the issue of birthright citizenship reached the Supreme Court during the Trump presidency. Earlier this year, the court ruled that federal judges have less power to block nationwide policies. However, the court did not decide the main question about citizenship rights. That question now stands before the justices in this new case.
The Supreme Court has also sided with Trump in several other immigration decisions this year. Those rulings allowed the administration to stop temporary protections for many migrants, expand deportations, and carry out large immigration enforcement operations.
The current case is significant because it could redefine what it means to be an American citizen. A ruling in favor of the administration would mark a major change in more than 150 years of constitutional practice. A ruling against the administration would reaffirm a long standing promise that all children born in the United States are equal under the law.
As the court prepares to hear arguments, families across the country are waiting for clarity. The decision will affect not only immigrants but also the future of American identity. It is now up to the Supreme Court to decide whether a president can limit a right that has shaped the nation since the end of the Civil War.
Traffic Control Measures Announced for A.R. Rahman Concert at IGI Stadium
Delhi Traffic Police introduces measures near IGI Stadium for A.R. Rahman's concert on Saturday even
Kim Woo-bin and Shin Min-a Tie the Knot After a Decade Together
Actors Kim Woo-bin and Shin Min-a celebrated their marriage in an intimate ceremony in Seoul, markin
Rohit Sharma Set to Play Initial Matches in Vijay Hazare Trophy for Mumbai
Rohit Sharma joins Mumbai’s squad for the opening two Vijay Hazare Trophy matches, spearheaded by Sh
Flight Disruptions at King Khalid International Airport
Friday's operations at King Khalid Airport in Riyadh were hampered by delays and cancellations due t
Kavem Hodge Achieves Second Test Century Against New Zealand
Kavem Hodge's unbeaten century leads West Indies to 381-6, evading follow-on against New Zealand in
Security Heightened in Bangladesh Following Youth Leader's Assassination
In response to the murder of youth leader Sharif Osman Hadi, Bangladesh elevates security measures a